From: Connor Abbott <[email protected]> This makes it match radeonsi. The LLVM backend itself will emit the correct instruction, but LLVM might do incorrect optimizations since it thinks the output is undefined when the input is 0, even though it's not supposed to be. We really need a new intrinsic, or for the backend to become smarter and recognize this pattern.
Cc: [email protected] --- src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c | 12 +++++++++++- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c b/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c index c08f102..75f3f78 100644 --- a/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c +++ b/src/amd/common/ac_nir_to_llvm.c @@ -1187,7 +1187,17 @@ static LLVMValueRef emit_find_lsb(struct ac_llvm_context *ctx, */ LLVMConstInt(ctx->i1, 1, false), }; - return ac_build_intrinsic(ctx, "llvm.cttz.i32", ctx->i32, params, 2, AC_FUNC_ATTR_READNONE); + + LLVMValueRef lsb = ac_build_intrinsic(ctx, "llvm.cttz.i32", ctx->i32, + params, 2, + AC_FUNC_ATTR_READNONE); + + /* TODO: We need an intrinsic to skip this conditional. */ + /* Check for zero: */ + return LLVMBuildSelect(ctx->builder, LLVMBuildICmp(ctx->builder, + LLVMIntEQ, src0, + ctx->i32_0, ""), + LLVMConstInt(ctx->i32, -1, 0), lsb, ""); } static LLVMValueRef emit_ifind_msb(struct ac_llvm_context *ctx, -- 2.9.4 _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
