On 02/08/17 01:57 PM, Keith Packard wrote:
> Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> writes:
>
>> +#if HAVE_LLVM >= 0x0500
>> + virtual void deregisterEHFrames() {
>> + mgr()->deregisterEHFrames();
>> + }
>> +#elif HAVE_LLVM >= 0x0304
>> + virtual void deregisterEHFrames(uint8_t *Addr, uint64_t LoadAddr,
>> size_t Size) {
>> + mgr()->deregisterEHFrames(Addr, LoadAddr, Size);
>> + }
>> +#endif
>
> I've got llvm 5.0.0 and it doesn't have this API change. Should that
> be > instead of >=?No. Is your LLVM 5.0 snapshot really SVN r302589 or newer? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Mesa and X developer
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
