2017-09-14 19:19 GMT-04:00 Bas Nieuwenhuizen <b...@basnieuwenhuizen.nl>:
> Also you can implement 0% of the feature list and still be vulkan 1.0 > compliant ;) > Oh... is that so? Thanks for all your answers, I apparently didn't understand what "being Vulkan 1.0" meant ;) So if I understand well, every time there's a new 1.0.yy version of Vulkan, it means that there's a new set of "extensions" (I don't know the appropriate erm) added to the previous version 1.0.xx, but it's not mandatory to implement them to be compatible with the 1.0 API. If the Vulkan API changes one day, it will be Vulkan 2.0?
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
