>
> I also think adding a test for each C++11 feature used in the code is
>
too tedious, regardless of the build system, and it would really need a
> dedicated maintainer.
>

Certainly.  Rather than checking for everything, I think a code snippet
that just includes a few c++11-only headers would be sufficient and just
assume if those are there then you have a working c++11 std library.
That's all we're doing with the std=c++11 check anyways; i.e. we're
assuming that there's no need to specifically check for support of
range-for loops and lambda expressions separately.  Partial standard
implementation is less of an issue these days I think than in the early
C++11 years.

- Chuck
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to