ping? On 11/10/2017 09:54 AM, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
It seems safe and it improves performance by +4% (73->76).A drirc based solution is not what we want for now, keep it simple and improve later if it's really needed. Signed-off-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com> --- src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c index d13b698e8f..f114f1a5a5 100644 --- a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c +++ b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c @@ -340,6 +340,24 @@ radv_get_perftest_option_name(int id) return radv_perftest_options[id].string; }+static void+radv_handle_per_app_options(struct radv_instance *instance, + const VkApplicationInfo *info) +{ + const char *name = info ? info->pApplicationName : NULL; + + if (!name) + return; + + if (!strcmp(name, "Talos - Linux - 32bit") || + !strcmp(name, "Talos - Linux - 64bit")) { + /* Force enable LLVM sisched for Talos because it looks safe + * and it gives few more FPS. + */ + instance->perftest_flags |= RADV_PERFTEST_SISCHED; + } +} + VkResult radv_CreateInstance( const VkInstanceCreateInfo* pCreateInfo, const VkAllocationCallbacks* pAllocator, @@ -399,6 +417,8 @@ VkResult radv_CreateInstance( instance->perftest_flags = parse_debug_string(getenv("RADV_PERFTEST"), radv_perftest_options);+ radv_handle_per_app_options(instance, pCreateInfo->pApplicationInfo);+ *pInstance = radv_instance_to_handle(instance);return VK_SUCCESS;
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
