Quoting Jon Turney (2017-11-14 04:05:21)
> On 13/11/2017 17:41, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > I thought I'd fixed this already,
> > Reviewed-by: Dylan Baker <dy...@pnwbakers.com>
> 
> This workaround is already in place for dep_xxf86vm.
> 
> I took a brief look, and didn't see anywhere the same problem could 
> occur with any of the other uses of [] for a dependency.
> 
> > Quoting Jon Turney (2017-11-13 02:28:27)
> >> It's ok to use an empty list for dependencies:, but it's not ok to try to
> >> use the found() method of it.

Ah that makes sense. Once we bump our minimum version so that the empty
dependency() doesn't generate console noise (I think you did that work?) I'd
like to switch to that.

You have commit access, correct?

Dylan

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to