On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:30:30AM -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:17 AM, Pohjolainen, Topi < > topi.pohjolai...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 03:47:26PM -0800, Jason Ekstrand wrote: > > > This moves it to being based on layout_to_aux_usage instead of being > > > hard-coded based on bits of a priori knowledge of how transitions > > > interact with layouts. This conceptually simplifies things because > > > we're now using layout_to_aux_usage and layout_supports_fast_clear to > > > make resolve decisions so changes to those functions will do what one > > > expects. > > > > > > This fixes a potential bug with window system integration on gen9+ where > > > we wouldn't do a resolve when transitioning to the PRESENT_SRC layout > > > because we just assume that everything that handles CCS_E can handle it > > > all the time. When handing a CCS_E image off to the window system, we > > > may need to do a full resolve if the window system does not support the > > > CCS_E modifier. The only reason why this hasn't been a problem yet is > > > because we don't support modifiers in Vulkan WSI and so we always get X > > > tiling which implies no CCS on gen9+. > > > > > > v2 (Jason Ekstrand): > > > - Make a few more things const > > > - Use the anv_fast_clear_support enum > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Topi Pohjolainen <topi.pohjolai...@intel.com> > > > --- > > > src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > -------- > > > 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c > > b/src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c > > > index 6a6d8b2..fd27463 100644 > > > --- a/src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c > > > +++ b/src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c > > > @@ -593,6 +593,7 @@ transition_color_buffer(struct anv_cmd_buffer > > *cmd_buffer, > > > VkImageLayout initial_layout, > > > VkImageLayout final_layout) > > > { > > > + const struct gen_device_info *devinfo = &cmd_buffer->device->info; > > > /* Validate the inputs. */ > > > assert(cmd_buffer); > > > assert(image && image->aspects & VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_ANY_COLOR_BIT_ANV); > > > @@ -733,17 +734,51 @@ transition_color_buffer(struct anv_cmd_buffer > > *cmd_buffer, > > > VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_COLOR_ > > ATTACHMENT_OPTIMAL, > > > final_layout); > > > } > > > - } else if (initial_layout != VK_IMAGE_LAYOUT_COLOR_ATTACHMENT_OPTIMAL) > > { > > > - /* Resolves are only necessary if the subresource may contain > > blocks > > > - * fast-cleared to values unsupported in other layouts. This only > > occurs > > > - * if the initial layout is COLOR_ATTACHMENT_OPTIMAL. > > > - */ > > > - return; > > > - } else if (image->samples > 1) { > > > - /* MCS buffers don't need resolving. */ > > > return; > > > } > > > > > > + /* If initial aux usage is NONE, there is nothing to resolve */ > > > + const enum isl_aux_usage initial_aux_usage = > > > + anv_layout_to_aux_usage(devinfo, image, aspect, initial_layout); > > > + if (initial_aux_usage == ISL_AUX_USAGE_NONE) > > > + return; > > > + > > > + enum isl_aux_op resolve_op = ISL_AUX_OP_NONE; > > > + > > > + /* If the initial layout supports more fast clear than the final > > layout > > > + * then we need at least a partial resolve. > > > + */ > > > + const enum anv_fast_clear_type initial_fast_clear = > > > + anv_layout_to_fast_clear_type(devinfo, image, aspect, > > initial_layout); > > > + const enum anv_fast_clear_type final_fast_clear = > > > + anv_layout_to_fast_clear_type(devinfo, image, aspect, > > final_layout); > > > + if (final_fast_clear < initial_fast_clear) > > > + resolve_op = ISL_AUX_OP_PARTIAL_RESOLVE; > > > + > > > + const enum isl_aux_usage final_aux_usage = > > > + anv_layout_to_aux_usage(devinfo, image, aspect, final_layout); > > > + if (initial_aux_usage == ISL_AUX_USAGE_CCS_E && > > > + final_aux_usage != ISL_AUX_USAGE_CCS_E) > > > + resolve_op = ISL_AUX_OP_FULL_RESOLVE; > > > + > > > + /* CCS_D only supports full resolves and BLORP will assert on us if > > we try > > > + * to do a partial resolve on a CCS_D surface. > > > + */ > > > + if (resolve_op == ISL_AUX_OP_PARTIAL_RESOLVE && > > > + initial_aux_usage == ISL_AUX_USAGE_CCS_D) > > > + resolve_op = ISL_AUX_OP_FULL_RESOLVE; > > > + > > > + if (resolve_op == ISL_AUX_OP_NONE) > > > + return; > > > + > > > + /* Even though the above code can theoretically handle multiple > > resolve > > > + * types such as CCS_D -> CCS_E, the predication code below can't. > > We only > > > + * really handle a couple of cases. > > > + */ > > > + assert(initial_aux_usage == ISL_AUX_USAGE_NONE || > > > > Earlier there is explicit early return for > > "initial_aux_usage == ISL_AUX_USAGE_NONE". Just checking if you really > > meant > > to assert it here. > > > > I don't know. I'm trying to make the point with the assert of what the > code can handle. I can't do this assert any earlier because we don't have > final_aux_usage until we get here.
I don't think it actually hurts to have it here. For a second I was just thinking how can we transition from NONE to something else. But the assert() actually says that we can't (among other things). > > > > > + final_aux_usage == ISL_AUX_USAGE_NONE || > > > + initial_aux_usage == final_aux_usage); > > > + > > > /* Perform a resolve to synchronize data between the main and aux > > buffer. > > > * Before we begin, we must satisfy the cache flushing requirement > > specified > > > * in the Sky Lake PRM Vol. 7, "MCS Buffer for Render Target(s)": > > > @@ -774,10 +809,7 @@ transition_color_buffer(struct anv_cmd_buffer > > *cmd_buffer, > > > genX(load_needs_resolve_predicate)(cmd_buffer, image, aspect, > > level); > > > > > > anv_image_ccs_op(cmd_buffer, image, aspect, level, > > > - base_layer, layer_count, > > > - image->planes[plane].aux_usage == > > ISL_AUX_USAGE_CCS_E ? > > > - ISL_AUX_OP_PARTIAL_RESOLVE : > > ISL_AUX_OP_FULL_RESOLVE, > > > - true); > > > + base_layer, layer_count, resolve_op, true); > > > > > > genX(set_image_needs_resolve)(cmd_buffer, image, aspect, level, > > false); > > > } > > > -- > > > 2.5.0.400.gff86faf > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > mesa-dev mailing list > > > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev > > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev