On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Ville Syrjälä <
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 04:43:15PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On 14 February 2018 at 16:27, Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net>
> > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 3:39 AM, Daniel Stone <dan...@fooishbar.org>
> > >> > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Daniel Stone <
> dan...@fooishbar.org> wrote:
> > >> >> For actual scanout, the kernel very specifically demands that if
> > >> >> BO is X-tiled, then set_tiling be called with TILING_X. This
> > >> >> even if we explicitly allocate with MOD_X_TILED and pass that in
> > >> >> drmModeAddFB2WithModifiers: there is an explicit check for
> > >> >> !!(bo_tiling == TILING_X) == !!(modifier == MOD_X_TILED).
> > >>
> > >> You missed this bit. Suggested fixup: https://hastebin.com/xikopobiza
> > >
> > > I was really hoping I'd read wrong. I'm going with "that's a kernel
> Old kernels required TILING_X with MOD_X.
How many kernels is that?
> I changed that at some
> point to allow TILING_NONE with any modifier, but otherwise we
> require the BO tiling to match the modifier. Ie. you still can't
> mix TILING_Y + MOD_X for example.
Right. That's perfectly reasonable. It should be either TILING_NONE or
mesa-dev mailing list