Yeah, without the '=' that's better :)

Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <samuel.pitoi...@gmail.com>

On 03/07/2018 04:42 PM, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
We are conformant:

https://www.khronos.org/conformance/adopters/conformant-products#submission_308

v2: Actually not emit it on gfx9.
---
  src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c
index 150cbdab2e..ffc00fa888 100644
--- a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c
+++ b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c
@@ -280,7 +280,9 @@ radv_physical_device_init(struct radv_physical_device 
*device,
        disk_cache_format_hex_id(buf, device->cache_uuid, VK_UUID_SIZE * 2);
        device->disk_cache = disk_cache_create(device->name, buf, 
shader_env_flags);
- fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: radv is not a conformant vulkan implementation, testing use only.\n");
+       if (device->rad_info.chip_class < VI ||
+           device->rad_info.chip_class > GFX9)
+               fprintf(stderr, "WARNING: radv is not a conformant vulkan 
implementation, testing use only.\n");
radv_get_driver_uuid(&device->device_uuid);
        radv_get_device_uuid(&device->rad_info, &device->device_uuid);

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to