On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 14:09 +0100, Eric Engestrom wrote: > On Monday, 2018-05-14 13:53:37 +0200, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote: > > Fixes: 4e52cb51b5 ("swr/rast: Thread locked tiles improvement") > > --- > > src/gallium/drivers/swr/Makefile.sources | 1 + > > src/gallium/drivers/swr/meson.build | 3 ++- > > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/swr/Makefile.sources > > b/src/gallium/drivers/swr/Makefile.sources > > index a06d1d7b929..6753d501a0d 100644 > > --- a/src/gallium/drivers/swr/Makefile.sources > > +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/swr/Makefile.sources > > @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ CORE_CXX_SOURCES := \ > > rasterizer/core/threads.h \ > > rasterizer/core/tilemgr.cpp \ > > rasterizer/core/tilemgr.h \ > > + rasterizer/core/tileset.h \ > > rasterizer/core/utils.h > > > > JITTER_CXX_SOURCES := \ > > diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/swr/meson.build > > b/src/gallium/drivers/swr/meson.build > > index 575133def56..5b3b53d0acf 100644 > > --- a/src/gallium/drivers/swr/meson.build > > +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/swr/meson.build > > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > > -# Copyright © 2017-2018 Intel Corporation > > +# Copyright © 2017-2018 Intel Corporation > > You should probably revert that before pushing your commit :) > > > > > # Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a > > copy > > # of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to > > deal > > @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ files_swr_arch = files( > > 'rasterizer/core/threads.h', > > 'rasterizer/core/tilemgr.cpp', > > 'rasterizer/core/tilemgr.h', > > + 'rasterizer/core/tileset.h', > > Meson tracks #includes, so adding this is actually a noop, but for > consistency let's add it in for now. >
Ah, nice! That explains why it wasn't failing with Meson. > Reviewed-by: Eric Engestrom <eric.engest...@intel.com> > > Dylan, what do you think? Do we want to remove all the unnecessary > files() from meson, or keep them to mirror what was needed by autotools? > I'd vote 'remove', but the "let's do the same thing everywhere" argument > is valid; what do people think? I would also remove them. I don't see any reason to mirror what autotools do. The simpler it is, the better. After all, IIUC scons doesn't mirror autotools neither. J.A. > > > 'rasterizer/core/utils.h', > > 'rasterizer/memory/ClearTile.cpp', > > 'rasterizer/memory/Convert.h', > > -- > > 2.17.0 > > > > _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev