On Thursday, May 31, 2018 3:57:04 AM PDT Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 11:57 AM, Timothy Arceri <tarc...@itsqueeze.com> > wrote: > > safe -> precision safe > > I'd argue this would be the wrong fix. I would consider issues with > infinity and NaN not to be precision issues, so saying precision safe > only muddles the water.
Agreed, I'd write "Many of these optimizations don't handle NaN or infinity correctly." if you don't like the current comment. Feel free to put my ack on such a change.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
