Am 05.07.2018 um 19:11 schrieb Gert Wollny:
> The current spill code checks in each instruction of an instruction group
> whether
> spliing
spilling
> is needed and if so, it adds spilling for each component as a seperate
> instruction and it allocates a new temporary for each component and since it
> takes
> the write mask from the TGSI representation, all components might be written
> each time and as a result already written components might be overwritten with
> garbage like:
>
> ...
> y: MOV R9.y, [0x42140000 37].x
> t: MOV R8.x, [0x42040000 33].y
> ...
> MEM_SCRATCH WRITE_IND_ACK 0 R9.xy__, @R4.x ES:3
> MEM_SCRATCH WRITE_IND_ACK 0 R8.xy__, @R4.x ES:3
> ...
>
> To resolve this isse accululate
accumulate
> spills to the same memory location so that only one
> memory write instruction is emmited
emitted
> for an instruction group that writes up to all
> four components.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gert Wollny <gert.wol...@collabora.com>
> ---
> src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_shader.c | 93
> +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_shader.c
> b/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_shader.c
> index 5479861c58..354091322a 100644
> --- a/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_shader.c
> +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_shader.c
> @@ -4342,8 +4342,32 @@ static void tgsi_dst(struct r600_shader_ctx *ctx,
>
> if (spilled) {
> struct r600_bytecode_output cf;
> - int reg = r600_get_temp(ctx);
> + int reg = 0;
> int r;
> + bool add_pending_output = true;
> +
> + memset(&cf, 0, sizeof(struct r600_bytecode_output));
> + get_spilled_array_base_and_size(ctx,
> tgsi_dst->Register.Index,
> + &cf.array_base, &cf.array_size);
> +
> + /* If no componet
component
> has spilled, reserve a register and add the spill code
> + * ctx->bc->n_pending_outputs is cleared after each instruction
> group */
> + if (ctx->bc->n_pending_outputs == 0) {
> + reg = r600_get_temp(ctx);
> + } else {
> + /* If we already spilling and the output
> address is the same like
If we are
> + * before then just reuse the same slot */
> + struct r600_bytecode_output *tmpl =
> &ctx->bc->pending_outputs[ctx->bc->n_pending_outputs-1];
> + if ((cf.array_base + idx == tmpl->array_base) ||
> + (cf.array_base == tmpl->array_base &&
> + tmpl->index_gpr == ctx->bc->ar_reg &&
> + tgsi_dst->Register.Indirect)) {
> + reg = ctx->bc->pending_outputs[0].gpr;
> + add_pending_output = false;
> + } else {
> + reg = r600_get_temp(ctx);
> + }
> + }
>
> r600_dst->sel = reg;
> r600_dst->chan = swizzle;
> @@ -4352,42 +4376,39 @@ static void tgsi_dst(struct r600_shader_ctx *ctx,
> r600_dst->clamp = 1;
> }
>
> - // needs to be added after op using tgsi_dst
> - memset(&cf, 0, sizeof(struct r600_bytecode_output));
> - cf.op = CF_OP_MEM_SCRATCH;
> - cf.elem_size = 3;
> - cf.gpr = reg;
> - cf.type = V_SQ_CF_ALLOC_EXPORT_WORD0_SQ_EXPORT_WRITE;
> - cf.mark = 1;
> - cf.comp_mask = inst->Dst[0].Register.WriteMask;
> - cf.swizzle_x = 0;
> - cf.swizzle_y = 1;
> - cf.swizzle_z = 2;
> - cf.swizzle_w = 3;
> - cf.burst_count = 1;
> -
> - get_spilled_array_base_and_size(ctx,
> tgsi_dst->Register.Index,
> - &cf.array_base, &cf.array_size);
> -
> - if (tgsi_dst->Register.Indirect) {
> - if (ctx->bc->chip_class < R700)
> - cf.type =
> V_SQ_CF_ALLOC_EXPORT_WORD0_SQ_EXPORT_WRITE_IND;
> - else
> - cf.type = 3; //
> V_SQ_CF_ALLOC_EXPORT_WORD0_SQ_EXPORT_WRITE_IND_ACK;
> - cf.index_gpr = ctx->bc->ar_reg;
> - }
> - else {
> - cf.array_base += idx;
> - cf.array_size = 0;
> + /* Add new outputs as pending */
> + if (add_pending_output) {
> + cf.op = CF_OP_MEM_SCRATCH;
> + cf.elem_size = 3;
> + cf.gpr = reg;
> + cf.type = V_SQ_CF_ALLOC_EXPORT_WORD0_SQ_EXPORT_WRITE;
> + cf.mark = 1;
> + cf.comp_mask = inst->Dst[0].Register.WriteMask;
> + cf.swizzle_x = 0;
> + cf.swizzle_y = 1;
> + cf.swizzle_z = 2;
> + cf.swizzle_w = 3;
> + cf.burst_count = 1;
> +
> + if (tgsi_dst->Register.Indirect) {
> + if (ctx->bc->chip_class < R700)
> + cf.type =
> V_SQ_CF_ALLOC_EXPORT_WORD0_SQ_EXPORT_WRITE_IND;
> + else
> + cf.type = 3; //
> V_SQ_CF_ALLOC_EXPORT_WORD0_SQ_EXPORT_WRITE_IND_ACK;
> + cf.index_gpr = ctx->bc->ar_reg;
> + }
> + else {
> + cf.array_base += idx;
> + cf.array_size = 0;
> + }
> +
> + r = r600_bytecode_add_pending_output(ctx->bc, &cf);
> + if (r)
> + return;
> +
> + if (ctx->bc->chip_class >= R700)
> + r600_bytecode_need_wait_ack(ctx->bc, true);
> }
> -
> - r = r600_bytecode_add_pending_output(ctx->bc, &cf);
> - if (r)
> - return;
> -
> - if (ctx->bc->chip_class >= R700)
> - r600_bytecode_need_wait_ack(ctx->bc, true);
> -
> return;
> }
> else {
>
I'm not really too familiar with this code, but makes sense to me.
Are there piglit or dEPQ or whatever failures associated with this? If
so you could mention them in the commit log.
Reviewed-by: Roland Scheidegger <srol...@vmware.com>
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
