On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 01:29:29PM -0700, Nanley Chery wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 06, 2018 at 03:36:01PM +0300, Pohjolainen, Topi wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 12:21:52PM -0700, Nanley Chery wrote:
> > > This series fixes a couple stencil texturing bugs on HSW and
> > > cache-tracking for certain stencil BOs on all platforms.
> > > 
> > > Nanley Chery (13):
> > >   i965: Set the r8stencil flag in miptree_finish_write
> > >   i965/miptree: Set the r8stencil flag in map_depthstencil
> > >   i965/draw: Set the r8stencil flag after drawing
> > >   i965/draw: Fix adding the stencil bo to the depth cache
> > >   i965/miptree: Use make_surface in map_blit
> > >   i965/miptree: Delete MIPTREE_CREATE_LINEAR
> > >   i965/miptree: Share tiling_flags in miptree_create
> > >   i965/miptree: Share the miptree format in miptree_create
> > >   i965/miptree: Share alloc_flags in miptree_create
> > 
> > I'm not sure if this maintains the BO_ALLOC_BUSY.
> > 
> > >   i965/miptree: Add and use mt_surf_usage
> > >   i965/miptree: Refactor miptree_create
> > >   i965/miptree: Create the r8stencil_mt immediately
> > >   i965/miptree: Inline make_separate_stencil
> > 
> > Same here.
> 
> Yes, those two patches don't maintain BO_ALLOC_BUSY for the cases where
> the user creates a depth, depth-stencil, or stencil texture. It seems
> better this way though since, like a color texture, those are liable to
> be accessed with the CPU immediately.
> 
> I think we can maintain BO_ALLOC_BUSY for multisampled textures, since
> they will never be accessed on the CPU. I'll send a follow-up patch.
> Thoughts?

I'm fine with the change, just mention it in the commit message.

> 
> AFAICT, BO_ALLOC_BUSY wasn't used for those textures until commit
> a73d56dce37ae13f422215de1bf1fdfb8e2f6ed7, which allocated renderbuffers
> for depth stencil textures and implicitly (and perhaps accidentally)
> asked for a BUSY BO. I haven't thoroughly checked though.
> 
> > Otherwise the series is:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Topi Pohjolainen <topi.pohjolai...@intel.com>
> > 
> 
> Thanks for the review!
> 
> -Nanley
> 
> > > 
> > >  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_blorp.c         |   6 +-
> > >  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_clear.c         |   8 -
> > >  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_draw.c          |  14 +-
> > >  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.c | 211 ++++++++----------
> > >  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_mipmap_tree.h |   5 +-
> > >  src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_tex_image.c   |   3 -
> > >  6 files changed, 103 insertions(+), 144 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > -- 
> > > 2.17.0
> > > 
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > mesa-dev mailing list
> > > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to