Quoting Emil Velikov (2018-09-05 03:25:06) > On 4 September 2018 at 22:47, Dylan Baker <[email protected]> wrote: > > We require a single version of libdrm for all of our libdrm > > dependencies (core and driver), but the way this is structured can make > > the error message less than helpful, as one driver might be the one > > setting the libdrm requirement, while another might be the one that > > generates the version failure. > > > > This adds a simple message to the output announcing which libdrm module > > set the version, which might be more helpful. > > > Recently when libdrm_amdgpu was bumped, I noticed that it's version > was still imposed, even though I was building only classic i965. > Both gallium and vulkan drivers were explicitly disabled. > > Can you please look into that, if you haven't already. > > Thanks > Emil
I can't reproduce this. I set the amdgpu version to 2.4.1000 (to ensure that I couldn't fulfill it), then ran: meson build -Dgallium-drivers= -Dvulkan-drivers= -Ddri-drivers=i965 Things worked fine. You didn't happen to have radv enabled did you? That also pulls in libdrm_amdgpu. Dylan
signature.asc
Description: signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
