Hi Marek, there are two comments that will be confusing if they are not updated as well:
On Sat, 2018-09-01 at 02:54 -0400, Marek Olšák wrote: > From: Marek Olšák <[email protected]> > > --- > src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_inlines.h | 86 +++++++++++++------------- > 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_inlines.h > b/src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_inlines.h > index dee6f8f2d9e..7eb243779f7 100644 > --- a/src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_inlines.h > +++ b/src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_inlines.h > @@ -45,139 +45,139 @@ [...] > /** > * Update reference counting. > * The old thing pointed to, if any, will be unreferenced. > * Both 'ptr' and 'reference' may be NULL. * Both 'dst' and 'src' may be NULL. > * \return TRUE if the object's refcount hits zero and should be destroyed. > */ > static inline boolean > -pipe_reference_described(struct pipe_reference *ptr, > - struct pipe_reference *reference, > +pipe_reference_described(struct pipe_reference *dst, > + struct pipe_reference *src, > debug_reference_descriptor get_desc) [...] > /** > * Set *ptr to \p view with proper reference counting. * Set *dst to \p src with proper reference counting. > * > * The caller must guarantee that \p view and *ptr must have been created in * The caller must guarantee that \p src and *dst must have been created in > * the same context (if they exist), and that this must be the current > context. > */ > static inline void > -pipe_sampler_view_reference(struct pipe_sampler_view **ptr, > - struct pipe_sampler_view *view) > +pipe_sampler_view_reference(struct pipe_sampler_view **dst, > + struct pipe_sampler_view *src) regards Philipp _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
