https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108120
--- Comment #4 from Lionel Landwerlin <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Paul Menzel from comment #3)
> (In reply to Lionel Landwerlin from comment #2)
> > Sent https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/254342/
>
> Thanks, I just wanted to upload the same change. Two nitpicks.
>
> 1. Should the include be inserted lexicographically?
> 2. I always prefer to have the error message in the commit message.
>
> PS: I am not very involved in Mesa, but isn’t there a build tester, which
> should have caught that error? (Also, why did nobody else get it?)
Feel free to upload a better change, I'll review and push to master.
There are build testers. Not quite sure why it wasn't caught...
The only explanation I could think of is that we have different build option
(we usually build a large set of drivers, not just intel ones) and that somehow
pulls in a header file already including stdarg.h.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the QA Contact for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
