> > > > conformance/renderbuffers/framebuffer-object-attachment.html: 3 > > > > tests failed > > > > > > > Create and attach depthStencil renderbuffer > > > > PASS depthStencilBuffer = gl.createRenderbuffer() is non-null. > > > > PASS getError was expected value: NO_ERROR : > > > > PASS gl.getRenderbufferParameter(gl.RENDERBUFFER, > > > > gl.RENDERBUFFER_WIDTH) is width > > > > PASS gl.getRenderbufferParameter(gl.RENDERBUFFER, > > > > gl.RENDERBUFFER_HEIGHT) is height > > > > FAIL gl.getRenderbufferParameter(gl.RENDERBUFFER, > > > > gl.RENDERBUFFER_INTERNAL_FORMAT) should be 34041. Was 0. > > > > > > [ and 2 others of this sort ] > > > > > > I bet this will be our failure. We don't have test coverage for > > > GL_RENDERBUFFER_INTERNAL_FORMAT in piglit, which I'll try to fix. > > > > Cool, let me know. > > I wrote a test that checked that for all the internalformats we knew > of > for renderbuffers, the RB had that GL_RENDERBUFFER_INTERNAL_FORMAT. > The > test passed. I'll need to poke at the webgl testcase to figure out > where to look next.
Does this test pass in Chromium? Does this driver support the EXT_packed_depth_stencil extension? Firefox only supports DEPTH_STENCIL buffers when the EXT_packed_depth_stencil or OES_packed_depth_stencil is supported (note that EXT_packed_depth_stencil is mandatory at least in OpenGL 3.1). So if Mesa doesn't support this extension, that would explain the failure, and that would be a Firefox bug (though likely a WONTFIX one). I believe that Chromium doesn't require EXT_packed_depth_stencil support. Benoit _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
