So ... thinking about this a little more ... how is the new enable
different from the existing "EXT_framebuffer_sRGB" enable? When would
one be set but not the other?
On Thu, Nov 1, 2018 at 7:30 AM Gert Wollny <gw.foss...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Gert Wollny <gert.wol...@collabora.com>
>
> Dear all,
>
> yet another update, only to the Gallium part: i.e. the format check was
> simplified according to Mareks comment,
>
> Best,
> Gert
>
>
> Gert Wollny (3):
> mesa/core: Add support for EXT_sRGB_write_control
> mesa/st: enable EXT_sRGB_write_control for Gallium drivers that
> support it
> intel/i965: Enable extension EXT_sRGB_write_control
>
> src/gallium/docs/source/screen.rst | 3 ++
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/intel_extensions.c | 1 +
> src/mesa/main/enable.c | 4 +--
> src/mesa/main/extensions_table.h | 1 +
> src/mesa/main/get.c | 5 +++
> src/mesa/main/get_hash_params.py | 1 +
> src/mesa/main/mtypes.h | 1 +
> src/mesa/state_tracker/st_extensions.c | 5 ++-
> src/mesa/state_tracker/st_manager.c | 37 ++++++++++++--------
> 9 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.18.1
>
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
