On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 12:51:17PM +0100, Iago Toral Quiroga wrote:
> ---
> src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_cmod_propagation.cpp | 8 +++-----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_cmod_propagation.cpp
> b/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_cmod_propagation.cpp
> index 7bb5c9afbc9..dfef9d720a2 100644
> --- a/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_cmod_propagation.cpp
> +++ b/src/intel/compiler/brw_fs_cmod_propagation.cpp
> @@ -244,8 +244,7 @@ opt_cmod_propagation_local(const gen_device_info *devinfo,
> /* CMP's result is the same regardless of dest type. */
> if (inst->conditional_mod == BRW_CONDITIONAL_NZ &&
> scan_inst->opcode == BRW_OPCODE_CMP &&
> - (inst->dst.type == BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_D ||
> - inst->dst.type == BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_UD)) {
> + brw_reg_type_is_integer(inst->dst.type)) {
> inst->remove(block);
> progress = true;
> break;
> @@ -258,9 +257,8 @@ opt_cmod_propagation_local(const gen_device_info *devinfo,
> break;
>
> /* Comparisons operate differently for ints and floats */
> - if (scan_inst->dst.type != inst->dst.type &&
This wouldn't let, for example, (DF, F) pair thru while the new version does.
Should we keep this line?
> - (scan_inst->dst.type == BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_F ||
> - inst->dst.type == BRW_REGISTER_TYPE_F))
> + if (brw_reg_type_is_floating_point(scan_inst->dst.type) !=
> + brw_reg_type_is_floating_point(inst->dst.type))
> break;
>
> /* If the instruction generating inst's source also wrote the
> --
> 2.17.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> mesa-dev mailing list
> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
