On 19/1/19 12:02 pm, Eric Anholt wrote:
Timothy Arceri <tarc...@itsqueeze.com> writes:
On 11/12/18 5:11 pm, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 12/10/18 5:52 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote:
On 11/12/18 11:35 am, Ian Romanick wrote:
It seems like someone already sent out patches to implement this, and we
decided to not take it for some reason. Maybe it was Rob?
I discovered a thread from the beginning of 2017 titled "feature.txt &
EXT_debug_label extension". But couldn't find any implementation.
There was a reply from yourself, but it seems incorrect to me:
"I checked both extensions, and they're not "just" aliases. The EXT adds
a single function with an enum to select the kind of object. The KHR
adds a function per kind of object. It would be easy enough to add, but
it seems more valuable to suggest the developer use the more broadly
supported extension."
That's weird for a couple reasons. One, that's not even the discussion
that I was thinking of. I'll check in the morning to see if I can find
it. Two, I was clearly full of it... I really don't see how I came that
conclusion. I don't even see any other related extensions that I could
have been confusing either thing with.
So do you think we should push this?
I don't see any piglit or CTS tests for this extension.
Maybe I should have worded my reply above better. I'm happy to port the
KHR_debug equivalent test. First I just want to know if people think we
should go ahead and add support for this extension.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
