On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 4:57 AM Michel Dänzer <mic...@daenzer.net> wrote:
> On 2019-04-02 12:39 a.m., Marek Olšák wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 1, 2019 at 1:28 PM Jan Vesely <jan.ves...@rutgers.edu> > wrote: > >> On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 12:30 -0400, Marek Olšák wrote: > >>> Does the attached patch fix the copy-buffer test? > >> > >> it does thanks. > >> Won't the compute only context still need some synchronization? > >> Is there anything else to guarantee that the data is in place after > >> return from resource_copy_region ? > > > > The synchronization is the same on gfx and compute rings. > > BTW, did you see https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110214#c24 > ? It does indicate some kind of synchronization issue between > si_resource_copy_region using a compute ring and other operations using > a GFX ring. > Only OpenCL uses the compute ring. xterm doesn't invoke OpenCL AFAIK. Marek
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
