r-b with the vega m ref changed in the commit message.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2019 at 11:18 AM Samuel Pitoiset <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On 6/12/19 9:58 AM, Michel Dänzer wrote: > > On 2019-06-11 5:03 p.m., Samuel Pitoiset wrote: > >> On 6/11/19 4:56 PM, Alex Deucher wrote: > >>> On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 10:43 AM Samuel Pitoiset > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> On VegaM, the visible VRAM size is equal to the VRAM size, which > >>>> means only two heaps are exposed. > >>> FWIW, this is not VegaM specific. The vram size could be equal to the > >>> visible vram size on any asic depending on whether the platform > >>> supports large or resizeable BARs or not. > >> Yeah, not saying it's specific to VegaM. It's just the first time I hit > >> this, so I included that patch in the VegaM series. :-) > > I think Alex's point (which I agree with) is that the commit log is > > inaccurate and misleading. > I will update the commit log before pushing. Forgot to do that for v2. > > > > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
