On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 14:03 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 10:29 +0200, Erik Faye-Lund wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-06-12 at 10:25 +0200, Erik Faye-Lund wrote: > > > On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 12:41 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 11:13 +0200, Erik Faye-Lund wrote: > > > > > > > > > So here's the question: How does people feel about hosting > > > > > this under > > > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/ogl-sample/? If people > > > > > are OK with > > > > > this, I will make that happen, and send out a patch to update > > > > > the link > > > > > we have in our FAQ once that's done. > > > > > > > > Sounds fine to me. I've needed to refer to the SI more than > > > > once, I'd > > > > be happy to have it in a well-known location. > > > > > > > > Vaguely related: Old-timers may remember that DRI used to have > > > > its own > > > > CVS repo on dri.sourceforge.net. If you want a git import of > > > > that tree, > > > > you can find it here: > > > > > > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/ajax/dri > > > > > > Hmm, for some reason I can't see the repo here, just the (empty) > > > issue > > > tracker. Even though the project is listed as public... Strange. > > Weirdly there are separate controls for project and repository > visibility, and the latter was set to "Only project members" for some > reason. Fixed, thanks! >
Thanks, I can see it now :) > > > > I'd be happy to move this under mesa/ too if we want. > > > > > > I think that'd be nice, yeah. I think it would be nice to keep > > > things > > > like this in some central location. > > > > > > One could also imagine that the SGI GLX realease in it's original > > > form > > > would be interesting to preserve in case other mirrors go down as > > > well. > > > Just for the heck of it, I've archived that as well, even though > > > it's > > > just a single tarball, so it ends up as just a single commit: > > > > > > https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/kusma/glx > > > > > > This could also be a candidate for moving under the mesa-group. > > > > Actually, perhaps this one belongs under the xorg-group instead of > > the > > mesa-group... > > Yeah, toss-up really. The glx code drop has both the client library > and > server support, so it's not entirely one or the other. libGL used to > live only in the X11 monolith, and (iirc) we moved it to Mesa during > m12n so it lived near the DRI drivers since that interface kept > growing. > Yeah, fair enough. I don't really feel the need to decide on this right now. I want to add a link to the ogl-sample code in our FAQ, so that's the only repo I have a motivation to do something with right now. I would say we move both the ogl-sample repo and the glx repo to the mesa organization, and mark them as read-only as we reasonably can. I'm pretty much indifferent to archiving vs permissions-tweaks, but I do very slightly lean towards archiving (AFAIK, owners can always push regardless of premissins-tweaks, so there's a *very* theoretical chance of something going wrong then). The glx-repo can wait until there's a motivation, I think. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
