After a conversation yesterday with a couple of the other Intel devs, I've come to the conclusion that *everyone* interprets WIP to mean something different. I heard no less than four interpretations.
* This series is good. It hasn't been reviewed, so don't click "merge." * This series has some sketchy bits. It probably isn't ready for review unless you've been tagged for design feedback. * This series has been reviewed. Incorporation of detailed feedback is in progress, but it's going to take some time. * This series is good, but there are some questionable patches at the end. Due to this lack of common understanding, we discovered at least one MR that was ready to go but had been ignored for months. :( This makes me wonder if other MRs have similarly languished for no good reason. Can we formulate some guidelines for how people should apply WIP to their MRs and how people should interpret WIP when they see it on an MR? _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
