On 6/1/12 2:06 PM, Oliver McFadden wrote:
On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:23:17AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On 6/1/12 3:33 AM, Oliver McFadden wrote:
Wouldn't "Intel(R) Open Source ..." be sufficient?
Wouldn't "Intel Open Source ..." be sufficient?
I am not a lawyer, period. Certainly not an Intel lawyer, therefore "no
comment."
That being said, from a technical standpoint, using (R) as standard
ASCII instead of the UTF-8 character might be a good compromise
considering we cannot guarantee correct display of the UTF-8 character
everywhere.
If it's a thing that needs compromise, sure, I suppose. But I'd be
fascinated to know why your lawyers think they need a marca registrada
in a place that (afaik) no other vendor thinks they do.
- ajax
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
