On 07/16/2012 11:20 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
On 07/16/2012 10:21 AM, Matt Turner wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org> wrote:
Nice. That works for me. Has a bug been reported to automake?
I emailed the automake mailing list and asked how to handle this and
the response received made it seem to me that this change was
intentional. :(
Also, could we do something similar to avoid more .cc files? The assembly
parser and lexer (in src/mesa/program/) are going to get converted to C++
soon, and I'd prefer to keep .cpp as our C++ extension.
We can, but do we really want to do some extra work to select the file
extension of some generated code?
I really don't care about .cc, .hh, or whatever as long as it's
generated code that we don't edit. I'd advocate for doing whatever's
the easiest solution. If it were code that's actually checked in, I
would probably actually care.
Header files are different because we actually say the name of them in
other source files. I'll concede on the .cc vs .cpp issue for generated
files.
It's unfortunate that these tools have hardcoded conventions...yy/cc/hh
or cpp/cpp/hpp for C++, and y/c/h for C only. Irritating, but that's
how it goes I guess...
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
