Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> writes: > On 11/02/2012 05:13 PM, Ian Romanick wrote: >> On 11/02/2012 03:01 PM, Paul Berry wrote: >>> On 2 November 2012 14:11, Ian Romanick <[email protected] >>> Oh yuck! Why not just fix the names of the Mesa functions? That >>> seems much better than carrying the work-around in the code >>> generator forever. >>> >>> >>> The reason I shied away from this approach is that there are a lot of >>> functions to fix (146 of them by my count), and I was worried it would >>> take a very long time to rename all references to them. >> >> That many? Ugh. Is it possible to switch the aliasing order? For the >> IsProgram case, IsProgramNV would alias IsProgramARB (instead of the >> other way around). Is that better or worse? >> >>> But I didn't actually try it. I'll try spending a few hours on it and >>> see how far I get. > > FWIW, I would like to see Mesa use the core names. IsProgramNV is > particularly odd because we don't support the extension it came > from...the name IsProgramARB makes a lot more sense.
Seconding this.
pgpJp2O8Awh1z.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
