On Thu, Nov 01, 2012 at 03:13:31AM +0100, Marek Olšák wrote: > On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Alex Deucher <alexdeuc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The problem was we set VRAM|GTT for relocations of STATIC resources. > >> Setting just VRAM increases the framerate 4 times on my machine. > >> > >> I rewrote the switch statement and adjusted the domains for window > >> framebuffers too. > > > > Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deuc...@amd.com> > > > > Stable branches? > > Yes, good idea. > > Marek
Btw as a follow up on this, i did some experiment with ttm and eviction. Blocking any vram eviction improve average fps (20-30%) and minimum fps (40-60%) but it diminish maximum fps (100%). Overall blocking eviction just make framerate more consistant. I then tried several heuristic on the eviction process (not evicting buffer if buffer was use in the last 1ms, 10ms, 20ms ..., sorting lru differently btw buffer used for rendering and auxiliary buffer use by kernel, ... none of those heuristic improved anything. I also removed bo wait in the eviction pipeline but still no improvement. Haven't time to look further but anyway bottom line is that some benchmark are memory tight and constant eviction hurt. (used unigine heaven and reaction quake for benchmark) Cheers, Jerome _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
