On 12/09/2012 07:41 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
Brian Paul<[email protected]> writes:
Hi Jordan,
set.c and hash_table.c look a LOT alike. Could the functions in set.c
be implemented in terms of the hash_table.c functions? It seems
little silly to have so much duplicated code.
The idea of the set code is to save most of the memory in the case that
all you're doing is storing a set of pointers. We've got some debug
code that also wants to use this in ir_validate.
Whether the set code is important enough to have just for these two
case, I'm not sure. I wouldn't have imagined that people wrote code
using many of these object types until I encountered minecraft, though
:)
I have no issue with the set api/interface. I was thinking the set
functions could be implemented in set.h with some inline functions
that just wrap the hash functions.
-Brian
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
