On Son, 2013-02-10 at 19:38 +0100, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > > diff --git a/lib/Target/R600/SIInstructions.td > b/lib/Target/R600/SIInstructions.td > index a09f243..7e50e86 100644 > --- a/lib/Target/R600/SIInstructions.td > +++ b/lib/Target/R600/SIInstructions.td > @@ -1423,8 +1423,8 @@ def : Pat < > /********** VOP3 Patterns **********/ > /********** ================== **********/ > > -def : Pat <(f32 (IL_mad AllReg_32:$src0, VReg_32:$src1, VReg_32:$src2)), > - (V_MAD_LEGACY_F32 AllReg_32:$src0, VReg_32:$src1, VReg_32:$src2, > +def : Pat <(f32 (fadd (fmul AllReg_32:$src0, VReg_32:$src1), VReg_32:$src2)), > + (V_MAD_F32 AllReg_32:$src0, VReg_32:$src1, VReg_32:$src2, > 0, 0, 0, 0)>;
I still feel a bit uneasy about applying the SI changes without fully understanding why they break those piglit tests. Though I guess it might be okay if you're not targetting this for the Mesa stable branch... Tom / Christian, what's your opinion on this? -- Earthling Michel Dänzer | http://www.amd.com Libre software enthusiast | Debian, X and DRI developer _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
