On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 7:53 PM, Zack Rusin <za...@vmware.com> wrote: >> If ddx does not support swap, don't advertise it. We might also be >> able to get rid of the vmwgfx check (I'm not quite sure the purpose of >> that check vs. just checking dri2Minor. > > > No, not really. GLX_INTEL_swap_event doesn't have any hooks. You're checking > for presence of generic swap extension. > > Also unfortunately dri2minor has no correlation to glx_intel_swap_event. > There's no way to check for presence of GLX_INTEL_swap_event on this side. >
well, from what I can tell, if you advertise this extension applications will expect a swap event. Which will never come if dri/glx on client side remaps scheduleswap to copyregion. So maybe there are other conditions where we should not advertise this extension. But if we know we will never get events, we should not advertise this extension. BR, -R > > z _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
