Am 25.03.2013 17:50, schrieb Jerome Glisse:
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Christian König
<deathsim...@vodafone.de> wrote:
Am 25.03.2013 17:01, schrieb j.gli...@gmail.com:
From: Jerome Glisse <jgli...@redhat.com>
Same as on r600, trace cs execution by writting cs offset after each
states, this allow to pin point lockup inside command stream and
narrow down the scope of lockup investigation.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse <jgli...@redhat.com>
Could your rewrite this to use an si_pm4_state instead of hand coding it?
It's cleaner and should reduce the needed code quite a bit.
Christian.
Well no, the whole point is to emit inside each si_pm4_state_emit so
that you can pin point which reg/packet trigger the lockup.
Ok, well then it makes no sense that you increment the counter only once
per flush.
Christian.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
