On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 1:31 PM, Roland Scheidegger <srol...@vmware.com> wrote: > I'm not really convinced of this idea. > There's already PIPE_CAP_MIXED_COLORBUFFER_FORMATS which is sort of > similar - a "requirement" of ARB_fbo, but it isn't used to determine > support of ARB_fbo or not (my guess is drivers want to advertize ARB_fbo > even if they can't do it, and ARB_fbo doesn't really have a hard > requirement for anything as you always can say "no" to fb supported). > So I can't see why not supporting different width/height is treated > different to not supporting different formats.
Actually, ARB_framebuffer_object does have a hard requirement on rendering to differently sized attachments. FRAMEBUFFER_UNSUPPORTED is only allowed for format-issues. EXT_framebuffer_objects can still be supported on hardware that cannot meet this requirement. _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
