On 10/11/2013 06:06 PM, John Sheu wrote:
On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Chad Versace
<chad.vers...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
Yes. Let's update the spec to have a saner interface before we lose a handle
on all the consumers.
Sweet.
To my knowledge, there exists only two implementations.
ARM ships an implementation for Android on Mali. I don't see such
a spec update hurting ARM, because Android devices
are fairly locked down systems with a monolithic source tree for each
device.
As far as I know, the Mali driver dropped to Android doesn't have an
implementation yet, so we're clear here. The Mali driver dropped to
ChromeOS does -- because I implemented it :-). So I think we're good
on spec changes with respect to Mali. If the Intel folks are fine
too, then we can do it.
That's a surprise! I knew ARM shipped an implementation, but I always
assumed it was for Android.
Can give us some details on how ChromeOS/ARM uses it? As you may
have heard through other channels, I've proposed that ChromeOS/Intel
use it to enable cross-process zero-copy texture uploads.
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
