On Thu, Oct 24, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Erik Faye-Lund <kusmab...@gmail.com> wrote: > But wait a minute. x shifted by 0 is x, so the latter part looks > correct. But the first conditional seems to assume that 0 sifted by x > is x, but it's really 0, no? Shouldn't both cases return > ir->operands[0]? What am I missing?
I think Eric and I should now be banned from reviewing each other's patches to opt_algebraic. :) _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
