Normally, nothing uses live intervals at this point, so this isn't
necessary.  However, dump_instructions() calculates them and uses them
to show register pressure.  So, calling dump_instructions() in this area
of the code would segfault due to the arrays being the wrong size.

This is not a candidate for stable branches because it only serves to
fix internal debugging code that you manually have to invoke by altering
the source code or using gdb.

Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
---
 src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp 
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp
index 3fab309..0945343 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs.cpp
@@ -1883,6 +1883,7 @@ fs_visitor::move_uniform_array_access_to_pull_constants()
          inst->src[i].reladdr = NULL;
       }
    }
+   invalidate_live_intervals();
 }
 
 /**
@@ -1968,6 +1969,7 @@ fs_visitor::setup_pull_constants()
         inst->src[i].set_smear(pull_index & 3);
       }
    }
+   invalidate_live_intervals();
 }
 
 bool
-- 
1.9.0

_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to