On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Roland Scheidegger <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 18.08.2014 23:24, schrieb Marek Olšák: >> From: Marek Olšák <[email protected]> >> >> --- >> src/gallium/drivers/rbug/rbug_context.c | 2 +- >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/rbug/rbug_context.c >> b/src/gallium/drivers/rbug/rbug_context.c >> index ca94590..d6fca2e 100644 >> --- a/src/gallium/drivers/rbug/rbug_context.c >> +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/rbug/rbug_context.c >> @@ -758,7 +758,7 @@ rbug_set_vertex_buffers(struct pipe_context *_pipe, >> >> pipe_mutex_lock(rb_pipe->call_mutex); >> >> - if (num_buffers) { >> + if (num_buffers && _buffers) { >> memcpy(unwrapped_buffers, _buffers, num_buffers * sizeof(*_buffers)); >> for (i = 0; i < num_buffers; i++) >> unwrapped_buffers[i].buffer = >> rbug_resource_unwrap(_buffers[i].buffer); >> > > This looks to me like it still won't handle buffer updates not starting > from slot zero correctly.
It will. Start_slot doesn't affect the buffers array in any way. Marek _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
