Hmm, I don't trust myself with gotos yet because I still don't have much
experience writing them.  So maybe I'll use them for a different patch
later.

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Ilia Mirkin <[email protected]> wrote:

> Reviewed-by: Ilia Mirkin <[email protected]>
>
> An alternative, btw, is to do a goto to the existing unlock. This
> would have the advantage of keeping a single unlock, and a single
> return path in the function. Your call, you get the R-b either way.
>
>   -ilia
>
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 2:23 PM, Laura Ekstrand <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Ilia Mirkin found that I had forgotten to free the mutex in the error
> case.
> > ---
> >  src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c b/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c
> > index b67e1c4..c7ef90b 100644
> > --- a/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c
> > +++ b/src/mesa/main/bufferobj.c
> > @@ -1353,6 +1353,7 @@ create_buffers(GLsizei n, GLuint *buffers, bool
> dsa)
> >           buf = ctx->Driver.NewBufferObject(ctx, buffers[i]);
> >           if (!buf) {
> >              _mesa_error(ctx, GL_OUT_OF_MEMORY, "%s", func);
> > +            mtx_unlock(&ctx->Shared->Mutex);
> >              return;
> >           }
> >        }
> > --
> > 2.1.0
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > mesa-dev mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
>
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to