On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 9:19 AM, Emil Velikov <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Strictly speaking the xcb_connection_has_error() might be sufficient,
> yet the documentation does not mention what will happen if NULL is fed
> to the function.
>
> Keep things explicit, which will allow us to remove the dri2_dpy->conn
> checking with the next commit.

Its implementation is

int xcb_connection_has_error(xcb_connection_t *c)
{
    /* doesn't need locking because it's read and written atomically. */
    return c->has_error;
}

so passing NULL is certainly not okay. :)
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to