Ben Widawsky <b...@bwidawsk.net> writes: > Either of you opposed to doing it as a follow-on patch? (This failure > you speak of was the primary goal for removing it). Initially, I tried > to remove it, but we do still seem to use this logic pre-HSW, and so > things got messier than I initially anticipated.
Doing a follow-on patch is fine by me. I'm not sure what you mean by the logic being used pre-HSW, but I guess I'll see when you post the patch :) > Neil, you said "if we go with this patch" - I haven't heard any > opposition, do you have any? No, it seems like a good idea to me. Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <n...@linux.intel.com> - Neil _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
