On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:34 AM, Emil Velikov <[email protected]> wrote: > On 14 September 2015 at 10:36, Sedat Dilek <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 4:18 PM, Emil Velikov <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On 4 September 2015 at 19:57, Sedat Dilek <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I compiled a toolchain based on LLVM/Clang v3.7.0 today and tested it >>>> with an updated version of my Linux Graphics driver stack (see >>>> attached logs). >>>> >>>> Here on Ubuntu/precise AMD64 I required two patches (see attached 0001 >>>> and 0002) post-mesa-10.6.5+ to build it successfully. >>>> Feel free to cherry-pick them to 10.6 Git branch. >>>> >>> Ftr the attached patches are master commits >>> 147ffd48166d851341cadd12de98895f32ec25a2 gallivm: Do not use >>> NoFramePointerElim with LLVM 3.7. >>> 09d6243aed016eed4518435c9885275dbb6d2aa9 gallivm: Workaround LLVM PR23628. >>> >>> Both of which seems like trivial and non-evasive changes imho, so >>> unless there are any objections I'll scoop them. >>> Iirc on the radeon side, more work is needed. So picking these won't >>> imply that building mesa 10.6.x with llvm 3.7 is officially supported >>> and/or tested. But a bit of "try it, if you're crazy enough" :-) >>> >>> Thanks Sedat ! >>> >> >> Yes, both patches where cherry-picked from Git master for mesa-10.6. >> >> What does your statement means in the end... >> Will those 2 patches go into mesa-10.6 (be included in mesa v10.6.8)? >> > It means two things > - they will (are) picked, considering the lack of objections. > - building with/against llvm 3.7 is entirely at your own risk and not > officially supported :-) > > I can see how my earlier reply was a bit confusing, hopefully thing > one is a tad clearer. >
Thanks, both patches landed in mesa v10.6.8. - Sedat - _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
