On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 9:31 AM, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Nanley Chery <nanleych...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 12:44 AM, Nanley Chery <nanleych...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > From: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.ch...@intel.com> > >> > > >> > Avoid the function call overhead for this one-liner. > >> > >> Can you measure the overhead? If not, there is no reason for this > change. > >> > > > > The .text size does decrease by 48 bytes: > > text data bss dec hex filename > > 5190616 209856 27712 5428184 52d3d8 lib/i965_dri.so (before) > > 5190568 209856 27712 5428136 52d3a8 lib/i965_dri.so (after) > > > > Is this sufficient? If so, I can add the snippet above to the git > comment. > > I don't think so. :) > > :) Okay. I suppose that the function isn't called often enough to warrant the loss of encapsulation. Thanks, Nanley > Marek >
_______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
