[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-168?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13233467#comment-13233467
]
Vinod Kone commented on MESOS-168:
----------------------------------
I'm not sure if you have talked to Ben about this, but I believe he already has
a fix for this. Not sure if he committed to the trunk though.
> Really bad timing can cause one framework PID to be registered with two IDs
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MESOS-168
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-168
> Project: Mesos
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Charles Reiss
>
> If message delivery is delayed enough, it's possible for a framework not to
> receive its FrameworkRegisteredMessage (with ID "A") before its (one second)
> timer to resend its RegisterFrameworkMessage (as part of reliable
> registration). The master will happily register the same framework PID again
> with a different framework ID (with ID "B"). The framework will receive
> offers for both ID "A" and ID "B", but will reply to offers as ID "B",
> causing the framework to CHECK()-fail when it checks the validity of the
> offers.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
