Alright, just posted it. Thanks for taking a look at this.

Matei

On Mar 29, 2012, at 10:53 PM, Benjamin Hindman wrote:

> Yes please.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 7:52 PM, Matei Zaharia <[email protected]>wrote:
> 
>> By the way, I just tried Ben's suggestions to use Protobuf 2.4.1 and it
>> did mostly works (a few other things I had to change were references to
>> protobuf 2.3.0 in src/python/setup.py.in, Hadoop, and the test framework
>> launch scripts). Want me to post a patch for this?
>> 
>> Matei
>> 
>> On Mar 29, 2012, at 10:16 PM, Matei Zaharia wrote:
>> 
>>> Smaller releases are definitely a good thing, but I brought this up
>> because it's slightly tough to put in a minor release, since you'll change
>> the version of a library that other people depend on. If there's no need to
>> stick with protobuf 2.3 for some existing use, then maybe we should just go
>> to 2.4.
>>> 
>>> Matei
>>> 
>>> On Mar 29, 2012, at 10:03 PM, Andy Konwinski wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I would prefer to hold off and try to get a *much* smaller 2nd release
>> out
>>>> the door within a month or two after this one.
>>>> 
>>>> Having a list of features to go into that one (including this feature)
>> is a
>>>> good thing. I'd go so far as to suggest we start the JIRA for the second
>>>> release now, and even pick a target release date for it (end of May?)
>>>> 
>>>> Andy
>>>> On Mar 29, 2012 6:41 PM, "Matei Zaharia" <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Okay, in that case, do you think it's worth doing it for the first
>>>>> release, or should we leave it till later? I'm okay either way, but
>> later
>>>>> versions of Spark will need 2.4.1 because stuff like Akka is using it.
>> I
>>>>> agree we shouldn't delay the release for minor things though.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Matei
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Mar 29, 2012, at 9:37 PM, Benjamin Hindman wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Most likely this is very straightforward. Possibly as easy as
>> replacing
>>>>> the
>>>>>> tar.gz in third_party and changing the third_party/versions.am to use
>>>>>> "2.4.1" instead of "2.3.0".
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Matei Zaharia <
>> [email protected]
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Just wondering, because 2.4.1 has been out for a while. I'm starting
>> to
>>>>>>> see other libraries depend on 2.4.1, which makes it tricky to link
>> Mesos
>>>>>>> into the same project.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Matei
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to