Re: Review Request: Added double-checked locking when using the paused clock, made sure that processes clocks advanced when events arrived even if they had no sender, did some minor refactorings for delivering events, and changed some logging levels.

[Vinod Kone]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/5262/#review8276
-----------------------------------------------------------


lgtm..though i dont completely understand the libprocess internals. i will let 
john take a look too, before giving a shipit


third_party/libprocess/include/process/clock.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/5262/#comment17905>

    sweet


- Vinod


On 2012-05-31 19:10:59, Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/5262/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2012-05-31 19:10:59)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, John Sirois and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   third_party/libprocess/include/process/clock.hpp 9480952 
>   third_party/libprocess/src/process.cpp 13bb713 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5262/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin
> 
>