-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6836/#review10875
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Mode potential flag using customer breaks this lgtm


src/master/flags.hpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/6836/#comment23435>

    Is this a breaking change for customers or are new Flags post 0.9 pre next? 
  Same issue with all the Duration flags in this review.


- John Sirois


On Aug. 29, 2012, 6:34 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/6836/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 29, 2012, 6:34 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, John Sirois and Vinod Kone.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/exec/exec.cpp c9f87fa 
>   src/flags/parse.hpp PRE-CREATION 
>   src/master/flags.hpp 6f450d5 
>   src/master/hierarchical_allocator_process.hpp 86c9b1e 
>   src/slave/constants.hpp ab83972 
>   src/slave/flags.hpp 0c7917f 
>   src/slave/slave.cpp 4efd41e 
>   src/tests/flags_tests.cpp 1372b0a 
>   src/tests/gc_tests.cpp 68f6e53 
>   third_party/libprocess/include/stout/duration.hpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6836/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Hindman
> 
>

Reply via email to