-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/7854/#review13113
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!



src/webui/master/static/jquery.pailer.js
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/7854/#comment28252>

    Me learning: is this actually necessary? Won't the "stringification" below 
via concatenation just "do the right thing"?



src/webui/master/static/jquery.pailer.js
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/7854/#comment28251>

    Are you missing '`': '&#x60;'?



src/webui/master/static/jquery.pailer.js
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/7854/#comment28250>

    s/escapeRegex/regex/ (given your naming above, 'escapeHTML', I'm thinking 
escapeRegex means a function for escaping a regular expression).



src/webui/master/static/jquery.pailer.js
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/7854/#comment28249>

    Me learning: is there not the analog of 'stringify' in JS that does this 
concatenation?


- Benjamin Hindman


On Nov. 3, 2012, 9:06 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/7854/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 3, 2012, 9:06 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Brian Wickman.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Added our own helper because it appears jquery doesn't support it: 
> http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/11773
> 
> Ideally, the pailer shouldn't need 3rd party libraries, so I based this on 
> _.escape from underscore.js (although simplified to not have to consider 
> unescaping).
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/webui/master/static/jquery.pailer.js 
> 9bcaf01f48941ab75f1156ad27c6ff03d5ede68b 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/7854/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manually tested with local runs.
> 
> 
> Screenshots
> -----------
> 
> before
>   https://reviews.apache.org/r/7854/s/11/
> after
>   https://reviews.apache.org/r/7854/s/12/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ben Mahler
> 
>

Reply via email to