-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/8096/#review13541
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Great, this is all that's needed to fix MESOS-310 right?

Also, I recall some discussion about this bit of code already, in terms of 
where to place it, do you remember what the context was?


src/slave/cgroups_isolation_module.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/8096/#comment29096>

    Link to the pertinent cgroup doc would be good for posterity.


- Ben Mahler


On Nov. 16, 2012, 11:24 p.m., Vinod Kone wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/8096/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Nov. 16, 2012, 11:24 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Now, we do the executor setup (fetching etc) inside the forked process but 
> before assigning the process to its own cgroup.
> 
> This accomplishes two things:
> --> unblocks the cgroups isolation module from any potential hangs during 
> executor setup
> --> does not charge (for memory) the executor for the setup
> 
> 
> This addresses bug MESOS-310.
>     https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-310
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/slave/cgroups_isolation_module.cpp 
> 8211618d7729350654e2d17946c5b912ed9dda6a 
>   src/slave/process_based_isolation_module.cpp 
> 16fd584e78db2c517d828f2576ab8a38c5ce57ad 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/8096/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> sudo make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vinod Kone
> 
>

Reply via email to