-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/10262/#review18740
-----------------------------------------------------------



third_party/libprocess/src/tests/process_tests.cpp
<https://reviews.apache.org/r/10262/#comment39160>

    At first I was confused but I see now that FutureSatisfy is essentially a 
trigger replacement?
    
    Would have been nice to document these two actions in the gmock header for 
others to read.


- Ben Mahler


On April 3, 2013, 5:34 p.m., Benjamin Hindman wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/10262/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 3, 2013, 5:34 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for mesos, Vinod Kone and Ben Mahler.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> See summary.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   third_party/libprocess/include/process/gmock.hpp 
> 4cf375837c3cbcdacf827abd2ec49744e753e86d 
>   third_party/libprocess/src/tests/process_tests.cpp 
> f49cabc91257e8cc72a45804a2ddbc28b4e06992 
> 
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10262/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> make check
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Benjamin Hindman
> 
>

Reply via email to