> On April 8, 2013, 10:37 p.m., Brenden Matthews wrote: > > This looks reasonable. I'll try it out overnight and report back tomorrow. > > Ben Mahler wrote: > Much appreciated!
It's been running with your patch for more than 24 hours now without any issues. The patch gets my approval. - Brenden ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10352/#review18802 ----------------------------------------------------------- On April 8, 2013, 11:02 p.m., Ben Mahler wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/10352/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated April 8, 2013, 11:02 p.m.) > > > Review request for mesos, Benjamin Hindman and Vinod Kone. > > > Description > ------- > > See my comments in the diff. > > The benefit of this solution is that the only modification needed is to > unsynchronize resourceOffers() and pull out the needed JobTracker data prior > to synchronizing explicitly. Longer term we will want to consider something > more robust against regressions. > > > This addresses bug MESOS-429. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-429 > > > Diffs > ----- > > hadoop/mesos/src/java/org/apache/hadoop/mapred/MesosScheduler.java > 50df625c914c158b368b71cf3e32428fbc637ad4 > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/10352/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Ran the tutorial for both of the supported Hadoop distributions. > > > Thanks, > > Ben Mahler > >
